August 23
rd 2023
Professor Auroop Ganguly
During our travels to Leh, Ladakh and Kathmandu, Nepal we came across references to Tibetan culture from religion, to food, and architecture. In fact, as we drove through the neighboring regions of Leh I would see bumper stickers proclaiming, “Free Tibet.” The storied history of the Tibetan region is speckled with different powers, principally China, seeking to control it. This history goes back to the 800s, but China exerted their influence significantly in the Qing dynasty, when Tibet was occupied in 1970 following an ousting of the Mongols (
BBC Tibet Profile). Much of the disputes over the region in the late 1700s were driven by nations seeking control over the Dalai Lama, the spiritual leader of Tibetan Buddhism. The Dalai Lama thus was a major reason for further disputes between Britain, Russia, and China through the 1800s, which concluded in Britain and Russia acknowledging China’s control of Tibet. Tibet regained Independence in 1913 just to lose it around 1951 when Tibet was coerced to sign the “Seventeen Point Agreement” which established administrative and military Chinese occupation. On an international stage the Dalai Lama has been a key advocate for the liberation of Tibet. Major powers have not been incredibly vocal on a world stage about Tibetan sovereignty. Many factors including the current growing economic and political power of China disincentivize other world powers to weigh in on the territorial dispute. The United States has conceded to China’s claims to Tibet to hold some diplomatic favor with China. Around 2019-2020 some strides towards recognizing Tibet’s autonomy were made, mostly in the passage of H.R.4331 the Tibetan Policy and Support Act (Dolma, 2021). While this policy strengthens United States soft power and non-profit and human rights support in Tibet it does not directly challenge China’s authority. The United Kingdom has historically and remains to hold a firm anti-Tibetan Independence stance
(China- Country of Concern). Although Russia has history in the Tibetan region, Russia has consistently increased relations with China and has barred the Dalai Lama from visiting majority Buddhist regions in Russia (
Could Russia’s Buddhist Republics Complicate Relations With China?). India, a neighbor of China and the Tibetan region has carefully diplomatically toed the line between supporting or denying Tibet sovereignty. India’s neutral stance reflects their overall international position. The Central Tibetan Administration has proposed the Middle-Way Policy, named in part as a nod to the Buddhist concept of the Middle-Way referring to the balance between indulgence and asceticism (
The Middle-Way Policy). The Middle-Way Policy aims to provide autonomy to the three regions of Tibet giving them control over domestic issues while China controls international relations and matters of national security. This policy however has not gained any significant international headway due to the influence of China. It is my personal belief that while the Tibetan people deserve autonomy due to their cultural importance rather than their economic importance there is not enough of an incentive for major powers to push China on the issue further and neutrality better serves their interests.
References
Dolma, K. (2021, May 25). Biden Is Continuing the Trump Administration’s Revised Stance on Tibet.
Foreign Policy.
https://foreignpolicy.com/2021/05/25/biden-trump-tibet-china-policy-human-rights/
China—Country of Concern. (n.d.). GOV.UK. Retrieved August 23, 2023, from
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/china-country-of-concern--2/china-country-of-concern
Could Russia’s Buddhist Republics Complicate Relations With China? (n.d.). Retrieved August 23, 2023, from
https://thediplomat.com/2021/10/could-russias-buddhist-republics-complicate-relations-with-china/ Tibet profile—Timeline. (2012, February 15).
BBC News.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-pacific-17046222 The Middle-Way Policy. (n.d.).
Central Tibetan Administration. Retrieved August 23, 2023, from
https://tibet.net/important-issues/the-middle-way-policy/ Rep. McGovern, J. P. [D-M.-2. (2020, January 30).
H.R.4331 - 116th Congress (2019-2020): Tibetan Policy and Support Act of 2019 (2019-09-13) [Legislation].
http://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/4331